Last month millionaire Simon Taub built a wall in the center of his Brooklyn house; dividing the residence he shares with his estranged wife, Chana.
Apparently the whole thing started in 2005 when Chana got a protective order against Simon when the Judge issuing the order approved Simon’s request to build the wall. Chana went to the appellate court to try to stop him, but lost. (The appeal process took the better part of 2006.) So, the wall is up; dividing the house in 2. It goes through two floors of the Taub’s three-story house.
The New York Daily News called this “Brooklyn’s real life version of The War of the Roses (NY Daily News Article). A crowd gathered during the construction or, shall I say, “destruction” of the home. At one point, Chana was heard to yell: “They’re moving my shoes.” I think Chana’s got bigger problems than having her shoes moved. And, I’m trying hard to refrain from quoting Abe Lincoln. I think he said something about “A house divided.”
No communication resulting herein shall create an attorney-client relationship unless a separate retainer is signed by the attorney and the client. Viewing of this web site does not constitute the provision of legal advice and no attorney-client relationship is created by viewing or responding to this website. The information displayed on this web site is intended for viewers in California.
The information in this web site is published to inform our clients and friends about current issues of importance in the field of family law. The articles presented in this web site should be viewed only as a summary of each topic and not be construed as legal advice. Legal counsel should be sought for the answers to specific legal questions. This website is a communication concerning the firm’s availability for professional employment within the meaning of California Rule of Professional Conduct 1-400(A).
Rules governing our practice before the Internal Revenue Service require that we advise you that any tax advice on this website (i) is information only and not to be relied on and (ii) is not written with the intent that it be used, and in fact it cannot be used, to avoid penalties imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or to promote, market, or recommend to another person any tax-related idea.